Britten, Jones, Murphy & Stacy's Criteria
Britten, Jones, Murphy and Stacy provide the following guide for evaluating qualitative research:
- What is the research about?
- What is the value and importance of the research being undertaken?
- How clearly has the research question been formulated?
- The research question may not be formulated prior to doing field work, but by the time of writing the research report, the research question should be clear.
- How appropriate are qualitative methods for this particular research question?
- Would it have been more appropriate to use different methods?
- How generalizable are the results?
- Although qualitative research usually focuses on understanding a single setting or a small number of people, one cannot give up on developing a sampling strategy that would allow the researcher to consider the investigation's relevance in other settings.
- What criteria were used in selecting the case(s) for the study?
- The report should make the rationale behind selection decisions clear and provide evidence to support the success of the strategy.
- Is the methodology clear?
- Methods need to be clearly described and rationale for methodological choices provided (audit trail).
- There should be evidence that the researcher reflected on how the research process influenced the data collected (reflexivity).
- How systematic was the approach to data analysis in the study?
- There is a need for a clear and concise description of how the data were analyzed as well as evidence of rigorous, systematic analysis that should include a search for disconfirming cases.
- Is the analysis support by the data?
- There should be strong evidence in the data that support the conclusions being drawn by the researcher. This includes:
- how excerpts were chosen and if there are other data that make the same point.
- There should be enough information in the report to identify from whom (participant) the data were drawn (e.g. are excerpts from 1 respondent or 10 different respondents).
- Are research processes and findings communicated clearly and succinctly?
- What is the impact of the study?
- What is its practical and theoretical importance?
- How does it contribute to the body of knowledge on the topic?
- Is the research trustworthy?
- Do the descriptions seem faithful to the issue investigated?
- Does the analysis have some face validity -- does it resonate with readers' and colleagues' experiences?
Britten, N., Jones, R., Murphy, E. & Stacy, R. (1995). "Qualitative research methods in general practice and primary care." Family Practice. 12(1), 104-114.
Click here to return to Evaluative Criteria page